<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel><title>Doing More With Less | Comments</title><description>Doing More With Less</description><link>http://www.doigmorewithless.com/dmwl/blog.nsf/</link><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:25:07 PM -0400</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>Hair Today BALD Tomorrow!    #LotusKnows it&#8217;s Saturday Actually!</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:25:07 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Roy Rumaner</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Hair Today BALD Tomorrow!    #LotusKnows it&#8217;s Saturday Actually!</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Stupid keyboard!<br /><br />I was going to add that I am attending the local Baldricks event to cheer on those less follicle challenged than me.<br /><br />Good work on the sponsors - $1K is nothing to sneeze at.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Stupid keyboard!<br /><br />I was going to add that I am attending the local Baldricks event to cheer on those less follicle challenged than me.<br /><br />Good work on the sponsors - $1K is nothing to sneeze at.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.doigmorewithless.com/dmwl/blog.nsf/dx/03102010015628PMBMOQ8D.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#03102010052507PMLIGUAR.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hair Today BALD Tomorrow!    #LotusKnows it&#8217;s Saturday Actually!</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:23:00 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Roy Rumaner</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Hair Today BALD Tomorrow!    #LotusKnows it&#8217;s Saturday Actually!</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Shaving your head is not that big of a deal. I do it twice a week. :)]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Shaving your head is not that big of a deal. I do it twice a week. :)]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.doigmorewithless.com/dmwl/blog.nsf/dx/03102010015628PMBMOQ8D.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#03102010052300PMLIGU9F.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>#LotusKnows IBM Announces BlackBerry Client for IBM Lotus Connections</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Mar 2010 05:07:54 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jim Rainey</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>#LotusKnows IBM Announces BlackBerry Client for IBM Lotus Connections</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[So, can I download this for free? Do you have a link?]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So, can I download this for free? Do you have a link?]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.doigmorewithless.com/dmwl/blog.nsf/dx/03082010102020AMBMOKZ9.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#08032010170754LIGTXZ.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lotus is Dead - AGAIN??</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:28:24 AM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Denny Russell</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotus is Dead - AGAIN??</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[My company is a Lotus Notes/Domino shop. Much to my dismay, we choose SalesForce (instead of an integrated solution with Notes) but that's a conversation for another day.<br /><br />So just last week, we get on a call with them about better integrating with Lotus Notes and they came right out and told us that it was a dead platform and that no one uses it.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[My company is a Lotus Notes/Domino shop. Much to my dismay, we choose SalesForce (instead of an integrated solution with Notes) but that's a conversation for another day.<br /><br />So just last week, we get on a call with them about better integrating with Lotus Notes and they came right out and told us that it was a dead platform and that no one uses it.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.doigmorewithless.com/dmwl/blog.nsf/dx/02232010100556AMBMOKQA.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#02242010102824AMLIGL6B.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lotus is Dead - AGAIN??</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:17:28 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Hogne B. Pettersen</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotus is Dead - AGAIN??</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[He's got a point, though. However much I love Lotus Notes, and the possibilities in the product, the needs in my organisation is moving more and more away from application based solutions, and more and more towards web-based solutions. <br /><br />I don't think the Lotus Notes client will exist in the form it does today in a few years from now. IBM's solutions will be more based around mash ups, widgets and similar solutions. They're already on their way with Quickr and Connections (even if the API of those applications leave a lot to be desired.)<br /><br />In our new intranet, which we are developing these days, email, Sametime, Quickr, Connections and several other online solutions will be mashed together in a control panel. And there are plans to create web based solutions of several of our Notes applications.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[He's got a point, though. However much I love Lotus Notes, and the possibilities in the product, the needs in my organisation is moving more and more away from application based solutions, and more and more towards web-based solutions. <br /><br />I don't think the Lotus Notes client will exist in the form it does today in a few years from now. IBM's solutions will be more based around mash ups, widgets and similar solutions. They're already on their way with Quickr and Connections (even if the API of those applications leave a lot to be desired.)<br /><br />In our new intranet, which we are developing these days, email, Sametime, Quickr, Connections and several other online solutions will be mashed together in a control panel. And there are plans to create web based solutions of several of our Notes applications.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.doigmorewithless.com/dmwl/blog.nsf/dx/02232010100556AMBMOKQA.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#23.02.2010141728LIGQMG.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lotus is Dead - AGAIN??</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:27:34 AM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Pierre Lalonde</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotus is Dead - AGAIN??</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Love Mr Bentsen's quote. Tired of those comparaison with Exchange, tired about Lotus Notes dead or alive. Could we just work effectively with the tools that we are effective with?<br /><br />What about the client? If we could not serve him effectivy with the tools that we have, let's bring new, improve and more effective tools.<br /><br />At the end, the real client won't make any difference if you did it with this tool or this one, as it meets their needs.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Love Mr Bentsen's quote. Tired of those comparaison with Exchange, tired about Lotus Notes dead or alive. Could we just work effectively with the tools that we are effective with?<br /><br />What about the client? If we could not serve him effectivy with the tools that we have, let's bring new, improve and more effective tools.<br /><br />At the end, the real client won't make any difference if you did it with this tool or this one, as it meets their needs.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.doigmorewithless.com/dmwl/blog.nsf/dx/02232010100556AMBMOKQA.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#2010-02-23112734LIGMBA.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Thoughts on Lotus Connections versus Microsoft Sharepoint... #LotusKnows</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:32:33 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>goran</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Thoughts on Lotus Connections versus Microsoft Sharepoint... #LotusKnows</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[@tonyo: I wouldn say that sharepoint is "search". This is the biggest problem there. And yes... you need additional licences in order to get advanced one, which is not currently very advanced after a more deeper review!<br /><br />Information management? Common! What is that? An SQL engine? Be more specific?<br /><br />At the end out of the departmental use Sharepoint has no real expertise in global corporation appoach!<br /><br />The products are simply not comparable!]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[@tonyo: I wouldn say that sharepoint is "search". This is the biggest problem there. And yes... you need additional licences in order to get advanced one, which is not currently very advanced after a more deeper review!<br /><br />Information management? Common! What is that? An SQL engine? Be more specific?<br /><br />At the end out of the departmental use Sharepoint has no real expertise in global corporation appoach!<br /><br />The products are simply not comparable!]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.doigmorewithless.com/dmwl/blog.nsf/dx/11182009125216PMBMONY8.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#25.11.2009173233LIGUFE.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Thoughts on Lotus Connections versus Microsoft Sharepoint... #LotusKnows</title>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:43:10 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Brian M O&#8217;Curran</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Thoughts on Lotus Connections versus Microsoft Sharepoint... #LotusKnows</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Check out the 2010 offerings? OK, when are they going to be available? I need to do something NOW... Oh, yeah, and I need to run it on Linux. Is that going to be supported. I've had a look around the Microsoft website and it looks like you've "leveraged" alot of our marketing material around Connections. I guess when you're copying the innovations by others it's quicker to do that. So, actually, I've changed my mind, I'm not going to wait, I'm not going to buy-into a full Microsoft stack. I prefer to talk to people about an open solution. A solution that will run on whatever they've got in the data center without the need for your latest propriety version of desktop productivity products... while I'm sure the UI and functionality is going to be nice, it's not worth dragging all the Microsoft baggage to get it all working.<br /><br />Work Smart Tonyo! Be Free! <br /><br />-- Brian]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Check out the 2010 offerings? OK, when are they going to be available? I need to do something NOW... Oh, yeah, and I need to run it on Linux. Is that going to be supported. I've had a look around the Microsoft website and it looks like you've "leveraged" alot of our marketing material around Connections. I guess when you're copying the innovations by others it's quicker to do that. So, actually, I've changed my mind, I'm not going to wait, I'm not going to buy-into a full Microsoft stack. I prefer to talk to people about an open solution. A solution that will run on whatever they've got in the data center without the need for your latest propriety version of desktop productivity products... while I'm sure the UI and functionality is going to be nice, it's not worth dragging all the Microsoft baggage to get it all working.<br /><br />Work Smart Tonyo! Be Free! <br /><br />-- Brian]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.doigmorewithless.com/dmwl/blog.nsf/dx/11182009125216PMBMONY8.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#11222009084310PMBMO42M.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Thoughts on Lotus Connections versus Microsoft Sharepoint... #LotusKnows</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:06:37 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>tonyo</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Thoughts on Lotus Connections versus Microsoft Sharepoint... #LotusKnows</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[have a look at the 2010 offerings.<br /><br />probably the biggest reason to go to Sharepoint is that's it's overall an integrated platform for information management, search, collaboration and ECM. to get that from IBM, you need multiple, mis matched products. :)]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[have a look at the 2010 offerings.<br /><br />probably the biggest reason to go to Sharepoint is that's it's overall an integrated platform for information management, search, collaboration and ECM. to get that from IBM, you need multiple, mis matched products. :)]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.doigmorewithless.com/dmwl/blog.nsf/dx/11182009125216PMBMONY8.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#11202009120637PMLIGN3P.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Thoughts on Lotus Connections versus Microsoft Sharepoint... #LotusKnows</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:18:28 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Brian M O&#8217;Curran</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Thoughts on Lotus Connections versus Microsoft Sharepoint... #LotusKnows</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[It's a very solid product, nice UI, some interesting integration. There's also a lot of ex-Loti over there. Their offering certainly lacks the robustness of Lotus Connections. IBM has lots of integrations to the places I work all day long, the Notes client.. my inbox has really evolved into being a collaboration dashboard. I wish I'd invented "collaboration dashboard" but I swiped it from John Allessio... but, it doesn't make it any less relevant. <br /><br />-- Brian]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's a very solid product, nice UI, some interesting integration. There's also a lot of ex-Loti over there. Their offering certainly lacks the robustness of Lotus Connections. IBM has lots of integrations to the places I work all day long, the Notes client.. my inbox has really evolved into being a collaboration dashboard. I wish I'd invented "collaboration dashboard" but I swiped it from John Allessio... but, it doesn't make it any less relevant. <br /><br />-- Brian]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.doigmorewithless.com/dmwl/blog.nsf/dx/11182009125216PMBMONY8.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#11192009031828PMBMORTM.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Thoughts on Lotus Connections versus Microsoft Sharepoint... #LotusKnows</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:57:33 AM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ulrich Gander</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Thoughts on Lotus Connections versus Microsoft Sharepoint... #LotusKnows</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[So what are your thoughts on Jive Software. I was surprise to see the ahead of IBM in the latest Gartner report, as I have not heard of them before.<br /><br />Seem like a solid product, you think?]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So what are your thoughts on Jive Software. I was surprise to see the ahead of IBM in the latest Gartner report, as I have not heard of them before.<br /><br />Seem like a solid product, you think?]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.doigmorewithless.com/dmwl/blog.nsf/dx/11182009125216PMBMONY8.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#11192009115733AMLIGMW2.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>LotusKnows Motown!</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:51:40 AM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Bill Learned</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>LotusKnows Motown!</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[As a result of being on the LotusKnows bus my productivity has increased by 13% and my efficiency by 17%.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[As a result of being on the LotusKnows bus my productivity has increased by 13% and my efficiency by 17%.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.doigmorewithless.com/dmwl/blog.nsf/dx/10052009092555PMBMO3PR.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#10072009095140AMLIGJ9U.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>LotusKnows Motown!</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Oct 2009 01:24:35 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ray Bilyk</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>LotusKnows Motown!</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Did I miss the announcement about this? I couldn't find any information anywhere...]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Did I miss the announcement about this? I couldn't find any information anywhere...]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.doigmorewithless.com/dmwl/blog.nsf/dx/10052009092555PMBMO3PR.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#10062009012435PMLIGNEW.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>LotusKnows Motown!</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:19:54 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ed Brill</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>LotusKnows Motown!</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[*now* I'm nervous.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[*now* I'm nervous.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.doigmorewithless.com/dmwl/blog.nsf/dx/10052009092555PMBMO3PR.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#10052009101954PMLIG4RH.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Thanks Ed!</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:19:33 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Collaborative Business Leader and inspiring IT Manager</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[:-)]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[:-)]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.doigmorewithless.com/dmwl/blog.nsf/dx/09232009112945AMBMOL76.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#09242009011933PMLIGNBU.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Collaborative Business Leader and inspiring IT Manager</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:54:06 AM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ed Crandell</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Collaborative Business Leader and inspiring IT Manager</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[The correct link for "The New Voice of the CIO" study is:<br /><br />{ <a href="http://www.ibm.com/voiceofthecio" target="_blank" title="Link: www.ibm.com/voiceofthecio">Link</a> }<br /><br />The link originally included in the article points to a non-existent page in this blog.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The correct link for "The New Voice of the CIO" study is:<br /><br />{ <a href="http://www.ibm.com/voiceofthecio" target="_blank" title="Link: www.ibm.com/voiceofthecio">Link</a> }<br /><br />The link originally included in the article points to a non-existent page in this blog.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.doigmorewithless.com/dmwl/blog.nsf/dx/09232009112945AMBMOL76.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#09242009115406AMLIGLND.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#64;Kevin, good one...</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:27:31 AM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Brian M O&#8217;Curran</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Microsoft&#8217;s Blowin&#8217; Hot Wind?  No!? They wouldn&#8217;t just outright LIE would they??? Really!?!?!</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I like that analogy better!]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I like that analogy better!]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.doigmorewithless.com/dmwl/blog.nsf/dx/09222009092550PMBMO3PQ.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#09232009112731AMBMOL5T.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>agreed..</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:25:28 AM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Brian M O&#8217;Curran</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Microsoft&#8217;s Blowin&#8217; Hot Wind?  No!? They wouldn&#8217;t just outright LIE would they??? Really!?!?!</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I'd concede most people are fundamentally honest. But, I've heard of some real whoppers told in customer situations.<br /><br />Brian]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'd concede most people are fundamentally honest. But, I've heard of some real whoppers told in customer situations.<br /><br />Brian]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.doigmorewithless.com/dmwl/blog.nsf/dx/09222009092550PMBMO3PQ.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#09232009112528AMBMOL4J.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Microsoft&#8217;s Blowin&#8217; Hot Wind?  No!? They wouldn&#8217;t just outright LIE would they??? Really!?!?!</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:53:21 AM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Kevin Pettitt</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Microsoft&#8217;s Blowin&#8217; Hot Wind?  No!? They wouldn&#8217;t just outright LIE would they??? Really!?!?!</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I think a better analogy might be "bringing a gun to a spelling bee" :-)]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think a better analogy might be "bringing a gun to a spelling bee" :-)]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.doigmorewithless.com/dmwl/blog.nsf/dx/09222009092550PMBMO3PQ.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#09232009105321AMLIGKGE.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Microsoft&#8217;s Blowin&#8217; Hot Wind?  No!? They wouldn&#8217;t just outright LIE would they??? Really!?!?!</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:59:11 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ian Randall</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Microsoft&#8217;s Blowin&#8217; Hot Wind?  No!? They wouldn&#8217;t just outright LIE would they??? Really!?!?!</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Fighting fair only works when competitors share the same values of honesty and integrity.<br /><br />Clearly some very senior people working for Microsoft don't appear to share those values. I say some, because the majority of Microsoft staff are good decent people who do share those beliefs.<br /><br />To be fair, many marketing departments and sales people in companies bend the truith occasionally, but outright lies should never be tolerated.<br /><br />However, it's great that finally some senior IBM/Lotus Executives are calling the Microsoft bullies out on this matter.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Fighting fair only works when competitors share the same values of honesty and integrity.<br /><br />Clearly some very senior people working for Microsoft don't appear to share those values. I say some, because the majority of Microsoft staff are good decent people who do share those beliefs.<br /><br />To be fair, many marketing departments and sales people in companies bend the truith occasionally, but outright lies should never be tolerated.<br /><br />However, it's great that finally some senior IBM/Lotus Executives are calling the Microsoft bullies out on this matter.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.doigmorewithless.com/dmwl/blog.nsf/dx/09222009092550PMBMO3PQ.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#22092009115911PMLIG6PL.htm</link>
</item>

</channel></rss>
